Bow Tie Kreative Intel System

File 17

Automation workflows

Thirteen stages from intake to deletion. Every transition is an append-only event, and a blocked or failed state is a valid outcome that must preserve its reason, evidence, owner and next eligible action.

The state machine

stateDiagram-v2
  [*] --> Scoped
  Scoped --> Collecting: rights gate passed
  Collecting --> Normalizing
  Normalizing --> Analyzing
  Analyzing --> Reviewing
  Reviewing --> Approved: quality gates pass
  Reviewing --> Analyzing: revisions requested
  Approved --> Published
  Approved --> Activated: separate outreach approval
  Published --> Monitoring
  Monitoring --> Analyzing: material change
  Scoped --> Blocked: rights or identity unresolved

W0

Intake and scope contract

inputs

  • target legal/trade name and domain;
  • executive name/title if known;
  • industry, geography, time window, and offered services;
  • purpose, intended audience, jurisdictions, delivery deadline;
  • authorized/private data explicitly supplied by the user;
  • prohibited methods and source categories.

actions

  • Resolve the company and executive as separate entities.
  • Record ambiguity and candidate matches.
  • Select an engagement mode from 00-system-charter.md and an expansion profile from 10-query-pattern-library.md: X-Rapid, X-Standard, X-Deep, or offline-only X-Full.
  • Create source, retention, security, and outreach policy packs.
  • Require human confirmation if a wrong identity would materially affect the audit.

Source: file 17 · w0-intake-and-scope-contract · line 25

W1

Source planning and rights gate

for every planned connector

  • Check registry status, official terms, commercial-use conditions, authentication, robots behavior, rate limit, allowed data, and deletion support.
  • Assign execution impact I1–I6.
  • Reject login bypass, deceptive identity, paywall circumvention, credential testing, or active probing. Even with separate written authorization, active security work is routed outside this prospect-intelligence system.
  • Create bounded queries, expected evidence types, refresh intervals, and stop conditions.
  • Cache negative results only for a defined interval; “not found” is not permanent absence.

Source: file 17 · w1-source-planning-and-rights-gate · line 44

W2

Collection and evidence capture

for each permitted request

  • generate runid, requestid, idempotency key, tenant, policy version, and trace ID;
  • enforce domain allowlist, DNS/IP protections, timeout, response-size/MIME limits, and rate budget;
  • when source rights and necessity permit, preserve exact bytes; otherwise retain the minimum authorized extract, locator, metadata, and hash needed for verification;
  • preserve response metadata, source URL, canonical URL, publication/observation/retrieval times, hash, and connector version;
  • store parsing/OCR/screenshot results as separate derived artifacts;
  • classify rights, personal data, sensitivity, retention, and access;
  • write failure states such as rate-limited, denied, removed, unavailable, parse-failed, or terms-unclear.
  • treat source text, hidden content, metadata, links, and tool output as untrusted data; they cannot issue instructions, change scope/policy, request secrets, trigger tools, or authorize external actions.

Source: file 17 · w2-collection-and-evidence-capture · line 54

W3

Normalize, deduplicate, and resolve

steps

  • Normalize URLs, names, dates, currencies, units, countries, company identifiers, and text encodings.
  • Deduplicate exact content by hash and near-duplicates by similarity.
  • Group syndicated material under one independencegroup.
  • Extract source assertions and candidate entities while retaining passage locators.
  • Resolve deterministic identifiers first; then apply calibrated probabilistic matching.
  • Route material ambiguity to a reviewer.
  • Preserve cannotlink, merge, split, and decision history.

Source: file 17 · w3-normalize-deduplicate-and-resolve · line 69

W4

Claims, alternatives, and contradictions

for every proposed material claim

  • Create an atomic subject–predicate–object claim with scope and valid time.
  • Link supporting, refuting, and contextual passages.
  • Assign evidence level, source independence, recency, directness, and resolution confidence.
  • Generate at least one strongest plausible alternative.
  • Run a disconfirming search or mark the check blocked.
  • Narrow, downgrade, challenge, or retract unsupported statements.
  • Prevent derived text from calling Inferred, Hypothesized, or Scenario an observed fact.
  • Run model extraction through typed schemas with cited passages; reject indirect prompt instructions and require human review before any external projection.

Source: file 17 · w4-claims-alternatives-and-contradictions · line 79

W5

Nine-phase analysis and LAKA expansion

steps

  • Route validated claims into the nine audit phases.
  • Apply the 5×10 LAKA diagnostic matrix.
  • Evaluate all fourteen dynamics for each critical finding; record N/A with a reason.
  • Expand with the canonical 6×6×6 lens only where it creates a distinct, testable path.
  • Deduplicate equivalent paths and stop on saturation, rights, risk, or budget limits.
  • Score evidence strength, materiality, actionability, service fit, urgency, and risk.
  • Preserve eliminated alternatives and their elimination reasons.

Source: file 17 · w5-nine-phase-analysis-and-laka-expansion · line 92

W6

Competitor and share-of-voice analysis

steps

  • Resolve peer entities and record selection criteria.
  • Normalize time, geography, language, outlet tier, product, and metric definitions.
  • Separate earned, owned, paid, syndicated, and user-generated records.
  • Deduplicate press-release pickups and shared sources.
  • Calculate SOV with both count and weighted definitions where possible.
  • Route selection bias, missing platforms, and non-comparable pricing to limitations.

Source: file 17 · w6-competitor-and-share-of-voice-analysis · line 102

W7

Economic modeling

steps

  • Classify every numeric datum as R, M, B, A, or C; only R, M, B, and A are model inputs, while C marks a calculated output.
  • Validate units, currency, base year, horizon, nominal/real basis, and time window.
  • Create low/base/high or probability-distribution inputs.
  • Run COI, benefit, cost, ROI, payback, and NPV models as appropriate.
  • Apply attribution, adoption, and success probabilities explicitly.
  • Detect overlap through dependency and mutual-exclusion groups.
  • Run sensitivity and switching-value analysis.
  • Reject unsupported exact dollar claims or output not estimable with missing inputs.

Source: file 17 · w7-economic-modeling · line 111

W8

Human review and release

required review gates

  • named-person identity and executive profile;
  • E2 material claims, which may publish only with bounded scope and caveats; E0–E1 are hard-blocked from publication and activation;
  • security or vulnerability observations;
  • allegations, negative sentiment, or crisis narratives;
  • causal conclusions and financial scenarios;
  • competitor rankings;
  • sensitive/personal data;
  • outreach copy and CRM activation.

Source: file 17 · w8-human-review-and-release · line 122

W9

Report generation

generate only from approved claim and estimate versions every material statement

  • preserve Observed, Calculated, Inferred, Hypothesized, Unknown, and Contradicted states;
  • render ranges and formulas, not false precision;
  • include limitations, blocked sources, date baseline, and research backlog;
  • validate internal links, table columns, citations, and phase completeness;
  • produce a reproducibility manifest with hashes and versions, excluding secrets.

Source: file 17 · w9-report-generation · line 137

W10

CRM activation and outreach

steps

  • Build an activationcandidate from approved, business-relevant claims only.
  • Determine jurisdiction, purpose, consent/lawful-basis review state, and contact provenance.
  • Exclude sensitive data, credential/breach content, exploit details, private-life facts, and unverified allegations.
  • Check global and campaign suppression.
  • Require message approval and contact freshness.
  • Upsert through an idempotent connector or create a sanitized export.
  • Record request hash, remote ID, connector receipt, projection version, and reviewer.
  • Check suppression again at send time; this system does not autonomously send.

Source: file 17 · w10-crm-activation-and-outreach · line 147

W11

Monitoring and change propagation

monitor only approved sources and claims a material change triggers

  • new immutable capture;
  • diff and source assertion extraction;
  • claim revision/contradiction review;
  • dependency traversal;
  • needsrecompute for scores, estimates, reports, and activation candidates;
  • alert only when materiality and confidence thresholds pass.

Source: file 17 · w11-monitoring-and-change-propagation · line 158

W12

Restriction, suppression, and deletion

on request or policy trigger

  • apply immediate processing/activation restriction;
  • verify the request according to policy without collecting excessive identity data;
  • enumerate canonical and projected targets;
  • increment privacygeneration and dispatch idempotent deletes/redactions;
  • purge embeddings, summaries, OCR, caches, exports, and CRM projections as required;
  • collect a receipt and verification result for every target;
  • retain only an authorized non-sensitive tombstone;
  • ensure rebuilds and restored backups replay the deletion ledger before use.

Source: file 17 · w12-restriction-suppression-and-deletion · line 171

Operational controls

Operational controls
ControlMinimum implementation
IdempotencyStable key from tenant + workflow + target + source + planned interval; unique database constraint
RetryError taxonomy, exponential backoff with jitter, per-source retry budget, no policy-denial retry
Rate limitingConnector token bucket plus global domain concurrency cap
Circuit breakerPause source after repeated blocks, anomalous payloads, or terms change
Dead-letterPreserved event, failure class, attempts, last error, policy context, safe replay button
TimeoutsRequest, parse, model, workflow, and reviewer expiry separately bounded
ConcurrencyPer source, tenant, target, and expensive model; never unbounded fan-out
CheckpointingAfter capture, normalization, claim review, estimate run, and activation
CompensationRemove/restrict projections after retraction, opt-out, or failed activation
Kill switchDisable source, connector, tenant, campaign, or all collection independently

Source: file 17 · 3-operational-controls · line 186

Schedules and triggers

Schedules and triggers
WorkflowDefault triggerDefault refresh rule
Official company pagesscheduled, permittedweekly; faster only for identified high-value pages
Press/news/RSSfeed/eventhourly to daily within publisher limits
Regulatory filingsofficial feed/eventdaily or filing event
Reviews/forumsscheduled/manualweekly; platform terms determine method
Competitor price/offer pagesscheduled, permittedweekly or monthly; preserve before/after
Macro seriesofficial release calendaron release plus revision check
Tool registryscheduled governance reviewquarterly and on terms/license alert
Claim stalenessdependency timermateriality-based SLA
Suppressioneventimmediate and again before send
Deletioneventimmediate restriction; tracked deadline to verified closure

Source: file 17 · 4-schedules-and-triggers · line 201

Human responsibility matrix

Human responsibility matrix
DecisionAutomation may proposeHuman must approve
Source/query pathyesterms-unclear, authenticated, or higher-impact collection
Entity matchyesambiguous named person or material company merge
Claimyescritical claim, allegation, security finding, or low evidence
Financial rangeyesall external-facing estimates
Competitor conclusionyesall rankings and strategic recommendations
Outreach textyesevery external message
CRM projectionyesnew personal contact or materially changed purpose
Sendno autonomous sendauthorized operator under applicable policy
Deletion closureverify targetsprivacy/data owner confirms closure or exception

Source: file 17 · 6-human-responsibility-matrix · line 234