Finding quality score
6 dimensions · 0-100
FindingQuality = weighted mean of dimensions x 20
File 11
How the scores work
Scoring makes triage reproducible; it does not turn uncertain public evidence into certainty. Preserve the raw evidence, the component scores, the reviewer notes and the overrides.
The four rubrics
Opportunity priority score
11 dimensions · 0-100
BaseOpportunityScore = weighted sum x 20; RiskAdjustedPriority = Base x ConfidenceFactor x (1 - RiskPenalty)
Authority score
9 dimensions · -15 to 30
AuthorityScore = sum(positive terms) - sum(penalty terms)
Lead qualification score
8 dimensions · 0-100
Sum of dimension points
Finding quality dimensions
| Dimension | 0 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence | no support | credible single source/corroborated secondary | E4–E5, reproducible and current |
| Entity resolution | unresolved | probable match | exact legal/domain/person-role match |
| Recency | obsolete/unknown | relevant but aging | current for the decision/window |
| Directness | rumor | proxy | direct observation/measurement |
| Independence | copied origin | uncertain origins | independent origins |
| Contradiction check | none | basic check | strong alternatives actively tested |
Opportunity priority dimensions
| Dimension | Weight | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence strength | 15% | quality of the underlying finding |
| Economic materiality | 15% | plausible contribution margin, cash, risk, or capacity effect |
| Service fit | 15% | ability of the offered service to address the mechanism |
| Executive relevance | 10% | connection to named role and public priority |
| Strategic differentiation | 10% | moves beyond table-stakes improvement |
| Time to useful evidence | 10% | how quickly a test can confirm/refute value |
| Reversibility | 5% | ability to stop or recover |
| Capacity fit | 5% | likely operational feasibility |
| Urgency | 5% | cost/risk of delay or time-bound window |
| Novelty without intrusiveness | 5% | non-obvious but appropriate |
| Data sufficiency | 5% | inputs available to size or test |
Hard gates override the numeric score: unresolved identity, prohibited source or use, sensitive-personal-data dependence, exploit or credential dependence, a misleading financial claim, or no plausible service-to-mechanism fit.
Lead qualification dimensions
| Dimension | Points |
|---|---|
| target fits chosen industry/region/size constraints | 0–15 |
| public signal maps to offered service | 0–20 |
| evidence quality | 0–15 |
| plausible materiality | 0–15 |
| timing/trigger | 0–10 |
| responsible executive role resolved | 0–10 |
| lawful contact route and basis | 0–10 |
| small useful diagnostic can be offered | 0–5 |
Economic model confidence classes
| Model class | Inputs | Label |
|---|---|---|
| M0 | no volume/value inputs | not estimable |
| M1 | benchmarks/assumptions only | illustrative scenario |
| M2 | one reported/measured anchor plus benchmarks | anchored scenario |
| M3 | several target-reported/measured inputs | planning estimate |
| M4 | reconciled internal financial/operational data | decision model |
| M5 | controlled result/finance-confirmed | validated realized value |